Amazon's online retail success and entering into offline retail segments - Case study in reference to Porter's Five Forces Model
Porter’s Five Forces of
Competitive Analysis
And Amazon entering
into retail market
Porter’s Five Forces
Model
Introduction:
Micheal E Porter developed
the five forces model. The five forces model is therefore called as the Porter’s
five forces model. The 5 forces model was developed to assess the competitiveness
of a firm in an industry and thereby helps to develop its corporate strategies
accordingly.
Porter’s five forces model
is an analysis tool that uses five industry forces to determine the intensity
of competition in an industry and its profitability level. The five forces model
determines the profitability of a firm operating in a specific segment or
industry. Micheal E. Porter has described the five elements to determine the competitiveness strength
for a firm in an industry. The Five Forces were Porter’s conclusions on the
reasons for differing levels of competition, and hence profitability, in
differing industries. They are empirically derived, i.e. by observation of real
companies in real markets, rather than the result of economic analysis. The
five forces can be described with the help of below diagram. The five forces are:
The five forces are
frequently used to measure competition intensity, attractiveness, and
profitability of an industry or market.
Porter's five forces are:
1. Competition in the industry
2. Potential of new entrants into the industry
3. Power of suppliers
4. Power of customers 5.
Threat of substitute products
In reference to the case
given from Amazon entering into traditional retail segment, we can now analyze
the Porter’s five forces model to determine the expected level of profitability
and competition for Amazon in traditional retails segment.
Let us start our discussion with understanding the competition in the retail industry.
This force is the major determinant
on how competitive and profitable an industry is. In competitive industry,
firms have to compete aggressively for a market share, which results in low
profits. Rivalry among competitors is intense when: -
·
There
are many competitors
·
Exit
barriers are high
·
Industry
growth is slow or negative
·
Products
are not differentiated and can be easily substituted
·
Competitors
are of equal size –
·
Low
customer loyalty
We can observe that Amazon is a
premier brand in online retail market segment, now it wishes to enter into
traditional physical retail store segment. The traditional retail store
industry is giving huge external competition to Amazon from large retail
players like Wal-Mart and Target. There are already various competitors’
operating in the market, making it a monopolistic competition. It means Amazon
can face various competitions in the offline retail industry as regards to the
followings:
·
Amazon
will be a latecomer in the industry so it could not get the first mover
advantage which it got in online segment.
·
It
is a monopolistic market structure for Amazon thus it had to follow immense
price discrimination and product differentiation strategy for attracting
customers. While if we closely observe immense competition of Amazon it seems
only oligopoly market structure with immense competition from Walmart and few
other big players. But it is clear that Amazon will get competition in retail
segment in offline business from both big and small players.
·
Walmart
is one of the biggest competitors for Amazon in both online and offline
segment.
·
We
can observe that though the market is loaded with traditional retailers but
there are few big retailers to compete with Amazon and so Amazon need to have a
sound market policies formulation and strategic implementation process in
place.
In Amazon’s case, the strong force
of competitive rivalry is based on the following external factors:
High risk of investment (Strong
force)
High aggressiveness of firms (strong
force)
Low switching costs (strong force)
We can easily understand from the
above discussion that Amazon will face strong competition from Walmart and few
other big players in offline retail segment. There are few large players with
substantial competition, though huge number of small chains will also make
competition intense. The switching cost for customers is low and so makes the
project investment riskier.
Now, let us move our discussion to understand
the Bargaining power of suppliers.
Strong bargaining power allows
suppliers to sell higher priced or low quality raw materials to their buyers.
This directly affects the buying firms’ profits because it has to pay more for
materials. Suppliers have strong bargaining power when: -
There are few suppliers but many
buyers
Suppliers are large and threaten to
forward integrate
Few substitute raw materials exist –
Suppliers hold scarce resources
Cost of switching raw materials is
especially high.
If we refer to Amazon’s case we can
surely observe that Amazon has got a strong supply chain driver in case on online
segment. Amazon is also the manufactures of various products with its own brand
so we can observe few points:
·
Amazon
has well managed its backward integration and thereby managed a proper supply
chain management.
·
Amazon
has maintained its strategic warehouses to manage online retail business which
could be a competitive strength in offline industry as well.
·
Amazon
has demonstrated its competitiveness in its marketing and supply chain
management.
The third point of our discussion in
Amazon’s case understands Bargaining
power of buyers.
Customers have the power to demand
lower price or higher product quality from industry producers when their
bargaining power is strong. Lower price means lower revenues for the producer,
while higher quality products usually raise production costs. Both scenarios
result in lower profits for producers.
Customers exert strong bargaining
power when: -
Buying in large quantities or
control many access points to the final customer –
Only few customers exist –
Switching costs to other supplier
are low –
They threaten to backward integrate –
There are many substitutes –
Customers are price sensitive
Depends on the marketing channel
used for Amazon
Online stores & Traditional Offline
stores
Super Markets
Convenience Stores
Amazon is having a large customer database online. It
is premier in online business segment and thus have created a well satisfied
client base by introducing varied innovative techniques for its clients.
We will understand now the Threat of New entrants in case of
Amazon’s offline entry into retail business.
This force determines how easy (or
not) it is to enter a particular industry. If an industry is profitable and
there are few barriers to enter, rivalry soon intensifies. When more
organizations compete for the same market share, profits start to fall. It is
essential for existing organizations to create high barriers to enter to deter
new entrants.
Threat of new entrants is high when:
-
Low amount of capital is required to
enter a market
Existing companies can do little to
retaliate
Existing firms do not possess
patents, trademarks or do not have established brand reputation
There is no government regulation
There is low customer loyalty
Products are nearly identical
Economies of scale can be easily
achieved
In reference to
Amazon’s case we have observed that there is already existing competition in
the market with the huge players operating and competing with Amazon. The
competition with Walmart is immense as regards to both online and offline
business.
Though Amazon will
not face much competition with new comers in offline retail industry from large
players as Initial investment is high for setting up the retail set up. Though
if we consider mid-size retailers can create a big monopolistic market competition
for Amazon and other big players as well.
Amazon must consider the risk of competitors coming in the
market from both mid-size and large scale retailers.
The last but not the
least force is the Threat of Substitutes.
Amazon’s case can be analyzed in reference to the retail industry operation in
traditional model.
This force is
especially threatening when buyers can easily find substitute products with
attractive prices or better quality and when buyers can switch from one product
or service to another with little cost. For example, to switch from coffee to
tea doesn’t cost anything, unlike switching from car to bicycle.
Determining Factors
:-
First, if the
consumer’s switching costs are low
Second, if the
substitute product is cheaper than the industry’s product
Third, if the
substitute product is of equal or superior quality compared to the industry’s
product, the threat of substitutes is high
Fourth, if the functions,
attributes, or performance of the substitute product are equal or superior to
the industry’s product
In this case we can
observe that customers can switch from offline retail industry to online mode.
Amazon is already having a first mover or a leader in online segment. It is
coming up in the traditional retail model. The substitutes for physical retail
customers are online mode of purchasing only. The Amazon is already operating profitably
leading the online retail segment. Hence even if we talk about the substitutes
Amazon will get the best advantage and competitive position.
The above diagram clearly shows the growth rate percent and increased contribution of retail industry in overall GDP of our country from 2008-2018.
Summing up: We can conclude from the Amazon’s case that as Amazon is already operating well in online retail mode it can invest into the offline retail stores. It may not have sufficient experience, but being a large player and having a proper manufacturing and supply chain base with good online customer base can provide a challenging base for Amazon to enter into traditional mode of Retail business.
Enjoy learning !
Youtube channel : (PSB Training Academy ) https://youtu.be/6w47hFkwIkY
Blog: https://mbaandbba.blogspot.com/2020/07/
Podcast:https://overcast.fm/itunes1507693104/management-session-by-amrita-jha
Facebook :https://www.facebook.com/mbaamrita
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/amrita-jha-682340b2/
The entire article is explained in a very well-mannered. Easy to understand.
ReplyDeleteThank you
ReplyDelete